Beta-lactam antibiotic concentrations in critically ill patients with standard and adjusted dosages: A prospective observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Antibiotic concentration target attainment is known to be poor in critically ill patients. Dose adjustment is recommended in patients with altered clearance, obesity and those with bacterial species with intermediate susceptibility. The aim of this study was to investigate the variation of antibiotic concentration in critically ill patients with standard or adjusted dosing regimens. METHODS: The concentration of three beta-lactam antibiotics used in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, cefotaxime, piperacillin/tazobactam, and meropenem, was measured in patients with confirmed or suspected infection. Mid-dose and trough values were collected during a single dosing interval. The pharmacokinetic endpoints were a free antibiotic concentration that, during the whole dosing interval, was above MIC (100% ƒT > MIC, primary endpoint) or above four times MIC (100% ƒT > 4MIC, secondary endpoint). Non-species related MIC breakpoints were used (1 mg/L for cefotaxime, 8 mg/L for piperacillin/tazobactam, and 2 mg/L for meropenem). RESULTS: We included 102 patients (38 cefotaxime, 30 piperacillin/tazobactam, and 34 meropenem) at a single ICU, with a median age of 66 years. In total, 73% were males, 40% were obese (BMI ≥30) and the median SAPS 3 score was 63 points. Of all patients, 78 patients (76%) reached the primary endpoint (100%ƒT > MIC), with 74% for cefotaxime, 67% for piperacillin/tazobactam and 88% for meropenem. Target attainment for 100% ƒT > 4MIC was achieved in 40 (39%) patients, overall, with 34% for cefotaxime, 30% for piperacillin/tazobactam and 53% for meropenem. In patients with standard dose 71% attained 100%ƒT > MIC and 37% for 100%ƒT > 4MIC. All patients with reduced dose attained 100%ƒT > MIC and 27% attained 100% ƒT > 4MIC. In patients with increased dose 79% attained 100%ƒT > MIC and 48% 100%ƒT > 4MIC respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Beta-lactam antibiotics concentration vary widely in critically ill patients. The current standard dosing regimens employed during the study were not sufficient to reach 100% ƒT > MIC in approximately a quarter of the patients. In patients where dose adjustment was performed, the group with increased dose also had low target attainment, as opposed to patients with dose reduction, who all reached target. This suggests the need for further individualization of dosing where therapeutic drug monitoring can be an alternative to further increase target attainment.

Meropenem pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment and clinical response in ICU patients: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Several studies report lack of meropenem pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment (TA) and risk of therapeutic failure with intermittent bolus infusions in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The aim of this study was to describe meropenem TA in an ICU population and the clinical response in the first 72 h after therapy initiation. METHODS: A prospective observational study of ICU patients ≥18 years was conducted from 2014 to 2017. Patients with normal renal clearance (NRC) and augmented renal clearance (ARC) and patients on continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) were included. Meropenem was administered as intermittent bolus infusions, mainly at a dose of 1 g q6h. Peak, mid, and trough levels were sampled at 24, 48, and 72 h after therapy initiation. TA was defined as 100% T > 4× MIC or trough concentration above 4× MIC. Meropenem PK was estimated using traditional calculation methods and population pharmacokinetic modeling (P-metrics®). Clinical response was evaluated by change in C-reactive protein (CRP), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, leukocyte count, and defervescence. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were included, with a median Simplified Acute Physiology (SAPS) II score 37 and 90 days mortality rate of 32%. Median TA was 100% for all groups except for the ARC group with 45.5%. Median CRP fell from 175 (interquartile range [IQR], 88-257) to 70 (IQR, 30-114) (p < .001) in the total population. A reduction in SOFA score was observed only in the non-CRRT groups (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Intermittent meropenem bolus infusion q6h gives satisfactory TA in an ICU population with variable renal function and CRRT modality, except for ARC patients. No consistent relationship between TA and clinical endpoints were observed.

Meropenem Clearance in a Child With End-stage Renal Disease Undergoing Prolonged Intermittent Renal Replacement Therapy: A Case Report and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Meropenem is frequently used to treat severe infections in critically ill children. However, pharmacokinetic data on meropenem in children with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy (PIRRT) is limited. Our objectives were to evaluate meropenem clearance in a child with ESRD with and without PIRRT, compare the results to previous continuous renal replacement therapy studies in children, toddlers and neonates, and assess whether the currently used dose of meropenem is sufficient. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 5-year-old girl with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 12.8 mL/min/1.73 m 2 was diagnosed with pulmonary infection and treated with 300 mg meropenem once a day. PIRRT was performed for 8 hours every 2 days. We used WinNonlin to evaluate meropenem clearance with and without PIRRT. RESULTS: Our case showed that PIRRT increased the clearance of meropenem from 1.39 (1.3) to 2.42 L/h (2.3 mL/kg/min) and caught up 42.6% of the total clearance. This result is in accordance with previous studies in children but slightly less than seen in toddlers and neonates under continuous renal replacement therapy. The current dose of 300 mg once a day is not sufficient to reach the therapeutic target. CONCLUSIONS: Predicting meropenem clearance in children with ESRD undergoing PIRRT is difficult as clearance will be affected by renal function, PIRRT settings and other factors. Further studies are needed to explore the individual variability of meropenem clearance and optimize the dosing regimen.

Systematic Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Models for Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Meropenem in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

The altered pharmacokinetics of renally cleared drugs such as meropenem in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) might impact target attainment. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) is applied to individualize meropenem dosing. However, most population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models developed to date have not yet been evaluated for MIPD. Eight PopPK models based on adult CRRT patients were identified in a systematic literature research and encoded in NONMEM 7.4. A data set of 73 CRRT patients from two different study centers was used to evaluate the predictive performance of the models using simulation and prediction-based diagnostics for i) a priori dosing based on patient characteristics only and ii) Bayesian dosing by including the first measured trough concentration. Median prediction error (MPE) for accuracy within |20%| (95% confidence intervals including zero) and median absolute prediction error (MAPE) for precision ≤ 30% were considered clinically acceptable. For a priori dosing, most models (n = 5) showed accuracy and precision MPE within |20%| and MAPE <35%. The integration of the first measured meropenem concentration improved the predictive performance of all models (median MAPE decreased from 35.4 to 25.0%; median MPE decreased from 21.8 to 4.6%). The best predictive performance for intermittent infusion was observed for the O'Jeanson model, including residual diuresis as covariate (a priori and Bayesian dosing MPE within |2%|, MAPE <30%). Our study revealed the O'Jeanson model as the best-predicting model for intermittent infusion. However, most of the selected PopPK models are suitable for MIPD in CRRT patients when one therapeutic drug monitoring sample is available.

Transdermal Detection of MB-102 and Correlation to Meropenem Pharmacokinetics During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: In Vivo Results.

Critically ill patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) have medical conditions requiring extensive pharmacotherapy. Continuous renal replacement therapy impacts drug disposition. Few data exist regarding drug dosing requirements with contemporary CRRT modalities and effluent rates. The practical limitations of pharmacokinetic studies requiring numerous plasma and effluent samples, and lack of generalizability of observations from specific CRRT prescriptions, highlight gaps in bedside assessment of CRRT drug elimination and individualized dosing needs. We employed a porcine model using transdermal fluorescence detection of the glomerular filtration rate fluorescent tracer agent MB-102, with the aim to assess the relationship between systemic exposure of MB-102 and meropenem during CRRT. Animals underwent bilateral nephrectomies and received intravenous bolus doses of MB-102 and meropenem. Once MB-102 equilibrated in the animal, CRRT was initiated. Continuous renal replacement therapy prescriptions comprised four combinations of blood pump (low versus high) and effluent (low versus high) flow rates. Changes in transdermal detected MB-102 clearance occurred immediately with a change in CRRT rates. Blood side meropenem clearance mirrored transdermal MB-102 clearance ( r2 : 0.95-0.97, p value all <0.001). We suggest transdermal MB-102 clearance provides real-time personalized assessment of drug elimination and could optimize prescription of drugs for critically ill patients requiring CRRT.

Evaluation of Empirical Dosing Regimens for Meropenem in Intensive Care Unit Patients Using Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Target Attainment Analysis.

In the present study, population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was performed based on meropenem data from a prospective study conducted in 114 critically ill patients with a wide range of renal functions and various disease conditions. The final model was a one-compartment model with linear elimination, with creatinine clearance and continuous renal replacement therapy affecting clearance, and total bodyweight impacting the volume of distribution. Our model is a valuable addition to the existing meropenem population PK models, and it could be particularly useful during implementation of a therapeutic drug monitoring program combined with Bayesian forecasting. Based on the final model developed, comprehensive Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate the probability of target attainment (PTA) of 16 different dosing regimens. Simulation results showed that 2 g administered every 8 h with 3-h prolonged infusion (PI) and 4 g/day by continuous infusion (CI) appear to be two empirical dosing regimens that are superior to many other regimens when both target attainment and potential toxicity are considered and renal function information is not available. Following a daily CI dose of 6 g or higher, more than 30% of the population with a creatinine clearance of <60 mL/min is predicted to have neurotoxicity. With the availability of institution- and/or unit-specific meropenem susceptibility patterns, as well as an individual patient's renal function, our PTA results may represent useful references for physicians to make dosing decisions.

Population Pharmacokinetic Model and Dosing Simulation of Meropenem Using Measured Creatinine Clearance for Patients with Sepsis.

PURPOSE: Creatinine clearance (CCr) and pharmacokinetic parameters are markedly affected by pathophysiological changes in patients with sepsis. However, only a few reports have assessed renal function in patients with sepsis using the measured CCr. Furthermore, the administration regimen has not been sufficiently evaluated using a population PK (PPK) model across renal function broad ranges. Therefore, this study was performed to construct a meropenem PPK model for patients with sepsis using the measured CCr and evaluate the optimized meropenem dosing regimen based on the CCr. METHODS: Patients with sepsis who received intravenous meropenem at the Showa University Hospital were enrolled in this prospective observational study. The PPK model was constructed using blood samples and clinical information of patients. The probability of target attainment (PTA) indicates the likelihood of achieving 50% time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (% T > MIC) based on 10,000 virtual patients using Monte Carlo simulations. The PTA for each meropenem regimen was 50% T > MIC based on different renal functions using the Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: One hundred samples were collected from 31 patients. The final PPK model incorporating the measured CCr as a covariate in CL displayed the best fit. The recommended dosing regimen to achieve a PTA of 50% T > MIC of 4 mcg/mL was 1 g every 8 hours as a 3-hour prolonged infusion for patients with CCr 85-130 mL/min and 1 g every 8 hours as an 8-hour continuous infusion for patients with CCr ≥ 130 mL/min. CONCLUSIONS: This model precisely predicted meropenem concentrations in patients with sepsis by accurately evaluating renal function using the measured CCr. Extended dosing was demonstrated to be necessary to achieve a PTA of 50% T > MIC for patients with CCr ≥ 85 mL/min. Meropenem effectiveness can be maximized in patients with sepsis by selecting the appropriate dosing regimen based on renal function and the MIC.

Optimizing Meropenem in Highly Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Environments: Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Simulations in Critically Ill Patients.

Critically ill patients are characterized by substantial pathophysiological changes that alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) of hydrophilic antibiotics, including carbapenems. Meropenem is a key antibiotic for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli, and such pathophysiological alterations can worsen treatment outcomes. This study aimed to determine the population PK of meropenem and to propose optimized dosing regimens for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in critically ill patients. Two plasma samples were collected from eligible patients over a dosing interval. Nonparametric population PK modeling was performed using Pmetrics. Monte Carlo simulations were applied to different dosing regimens to determine the probability of target attainment and the cumulative fraction of response, taking into account the local MIC distribution for K. pneumoniae. The targets of 40% and 100% for the fraction of time that free drug concentrations remained above the MIC (ƒT>MIC) were tested, as suggested for critically ill patients. A one-compartment PK model using data from 27 patients showed high interindividual variability. Significant PK covariates were the 8-h creatinine clearance for meropenem and the presence of an indwelling catheter for pleural, abdominal, or cerebrospinal fluid drainage for the meropenem volume of distribution. The target 100% ƒT>MIC for K. pneumoniae, with a MIC of ≤2 mg/liter, could be attained by the use of a continuous infusion of 2.0 g/day. Meropenem therapy in critically ill patients could be optimized for K. pneumoniae isolates with an MIC of ≤2 mg/liter by using a continuous infusion in settings with more than 50% isolates have a MIC of ≥32mg/L.

Population Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics and Clinical Outcomes of Meropenem in Critically Ill Patients.

Several pathophysiological changes can alter meropenem pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients, thereby increasing the risk of subtherapeutic concentrations and affecting therapeutic outcomes. This study aimed to characterize the population pharmacokinetic (PPK) parameters of meropenem, evaluate the relationship between the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index of meropenem and treatment outcomes, and evaluate the different dosage regimens that can achieve 40%, 75%, and 100% of the dosing interval for which the free plasma concentrations remain above the MIC of the pathogens (fT>MIC) targets. Critically ill adult patients treated with meropenem were recruited for this study. Five blood samples were collected from each patient. PPK models were developed using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach, and the final model was subsequently used for Monte Carlo simulations to determine the optimal dosage regimens. A total of 247 concentrations from 52 patients were available for analysis. The two-compartment model with linear elimination adequately described the data. The mean PPK parameters were clearance (CL) of 4.8 L/h, central volume of distribution (VC) of 11.4 L, peripheral volume of distribution (VP) of 14.6 L, and intercompartment clearance of 10.5 L/h. Creatinine clearance was a significant covariate affecting CL, while serum albumin level and shock status were factors influencing VC and VP, respectively. Although 75% of the drug-resistant infection patients had fT>MIC values of >40%, approximately 83% of them did not survive the infection. Therefore, 40% fT>MIC might not be sufficient for critically ill patients, and a higher target, such as 75 to 100% fT>MIC, should be considered for optimizing therapy. A 75% fT>MIC could be reached using approved doses administered via a 3-h infusion.

Meropenem Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Regimen Optimization in Critically Ill Children Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a meropenem population pharmacokinetic model in critically ill children receiving continuous renal replacement therapy and simulate dosing regimens to optimize patient exposure. METHODS: Meropenem plasma concentration was quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography. Meropenem pharmacokinetics was investigated using a non-linear mixed-effect modeling approach. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to compute the optimal scheme of administration, according to the target of a 100% inter-dose interval time in which concentration is one to four times above the minimum inhibitory concentration (100% fT>1-4×MIC). RESULTS: A total of 27 patients with a median age of 4 [interquartile range 0-11] years, a median body weight of 16 [range 7-35] kg receiving continuous renal replacement therapy were included. Concentration-time courses were best described by a one-compartment model with first-order elimination. Body weight (BW) produced significant effects on volume of distribution (V) and BW and continuous renal replacement therapy effluent flow rate (Qeff) produced significant effects on clearance (CL): [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], where Vpop and CLpop estimates were 32.5 L and 5.88 L/h, respectively, normalized to a 70-kg BW and median Qeff at 1200 mL/h. Using this final model and Monte Carlo simulations, for patients with Qeff over 1200 mL/h, meropenem continuous infusion was adequate in most cases to attain 100% fT>1-4xMIC. For bacterial infections with a low minimum inhibitory concentration (≤2 mg/L), meropenem intermitent administration was appropriate for patients weighing more than 20 kg with Qeff <500 mL/h and for patients weighing more than 10 kg with Qeff <100 mL/h. CONCLUSIONS: Meropenem exposure in critically ill children receiving continuous renal replacement therapy needs dosing adjustments to the minimum inhibitory concentration that take into account body weight and the continuous renal replacement therapy effluent flow rate.

Population Pharmacokinetic Meta-Analysis and Dosing Recommendation for Meropenem in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

The optimal dosing regimen for meropenem in critically ill patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) remains undefined due to small studied sample sizes and uninformative pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) analyses in reported studies. The present study aimed to perform a population PK/PD meta-analysis of meropenem using available literature data to suggest the optimal treatment regimen. A total of 501 meropenem concentration measurements from 78 adult CRRT patients pooled from nine published studies were used to develop the population PK model for meropenem. PK/PD target (40% and 100% of the time with the unbound drug plasma concentration above the MIC) marker-based efficacy and risk of toxicity (trough concentrations of >45 mg/L) for short-term (30 min), prolonged (3 h), and continuous (24 h) infusion dosing strategies for meropenem were investigated. The impact of CRRT dose and identified covariates on the PD probability of target attainment (PTA) and predicted toxicity was also examined. Meropenem concentration data were adequately described by a two-compartment model with linear elimination. Trauma was identified as a pronounced modifier for endogenous clearance of meropenem. Simulations demonstrated that adequate PK/PD targets and low risk of toxicity could be achieved in non-trauma CRRT patients receiving meropenem regimens of 1 g every 6 h infused over 30 min, 1 g every 8 h infused over 3 h, and 2 to 4 g every 24 h infused over 24 h. The impact of CRRT dose (25 to 50 mL/kg/h) on PTA was clinically irrelevant, and continuous infusion of 3 to 4 g every 24 h was suitable for trauma CRRT patients (MICs of ≤0.5 mg/L). A population PK model was developed for meropenem in CRRT patients, and different dosing regimens were proposed for non-trauma and trauma CRRT patients.

Meropenem Population Pharmacokinetics and Simulations in Plasma, Cerebrospinal Fluid, and Brain Tissue.

Meropenem is a broad spectrum carbapenem used for the treatment of cerebral infections. There is a need for data describing meropenem pharmacokinetics (PK) in the brain tissue to optimize therapy in these infections. Here, we present a meropenem PK model in the central nervous system and simulate dosing regimens. This was a population PK analysis of a previously published prospective study of patients admitted to the neurointesive care unit between 2016 and 2019 who received 2 g of meropenem intravenously every 8 h. Meropenem concentration was determined in blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and brain microdialysate. Meropenem was described by a six-compartment model: two compartments in the blood, two in the CSF, and two in the brain tissue. Creatinine clearance and brain glucose were included as covariates. The median elimination rate constant was 1.26 h-1, the central plasma volume was 5.38 L, and the transfer rate constants from the blood to the CSF and from the blood to the brain were 0.001 h-1 and 0.02 h-1, respectively. In the first 24 h, meropenem 2 g, administered every 8 h via intermittent and extended infusions achieved good target attainment in the CSF and brain, but continuous infusion (CI) was better at steady-state. Administering a 3 g loading dose (LD) followed by 8 g CI was beneficial for early target attainment. In conclusion, a meropenem PK model was developed using blood, CSF, and brain microdialysate samples. An 8 g CI may be needed for good target attainment in the CSF and brain. Giving a LD prior to the CI improved the probability of early target attainment.

Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Population Pharmacokinetics of Meropenem in Neurocritical Care Patients: a Prospective Two-Center Study.

Morbidity and mortality related to ventriculitis in neurocritical care patients remain high. Antibiotic dose optimization may improve therapeutic outcomes. In this study, a population pharmacokinetic model of meropenem in infected critically ill patients was developed. We applied the final model to determine optimal meropenem dosing regimens required to achieve targeted cerebrospinal fluid exposures. Neurocritical care patients receiving meropenem and with a diagnosis of ventriculitis or extracranial infection were recruited from two centers to this study. Serial plasma and cerebrospinal fluid samples were collected and assayed. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte Carlo dosing simulations were performed using Pmetrics. We sought to determine optimized dosing regimens that achieved meropenem cerebrospinal fluid concentrations above pathogen MICs for 40% of the dosing interval, or a higher target ratio of meropenem cerebrospinal fluid trough concentrations to pathogen MIC of ≥1. In total, 53 plasma and 34 cerebrospinal fluid samples were obtained from eight patients. Meropenem pharmacokinetics were appropriately described using a three-compartment model with linear plasma clearance scaled for creatinine clearance and cerebrospinal fluid penetration scaled for patient age. Considerable interindividual pharmacokinetic variability was apparent, particularly in the cerebrospinal fluid. Percent coefficients of variation for meropenem clearance from plasma and cerebrospinal fluid were 41.7% and 89.6%, respectively; for meropenem, the volume of distribution in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid values were 63.4% and 58.3%, respectively. High doses (up to 8 to 10 g/day) improved attainment of meropenem cerebrospinal fluid target exposures, particularly for less susceptible organisms (MICs, ≥0.25 mg/L). Standard meropenem doses of 2 g every 8 h may not achieve effective concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid in all critically ill patients. Higher doses, or alternative dosing methods (e.g., loading dose followed by continuous infusion) may be required to optimize cerebrospinal fluid exposures. Doses of up to 8 to 10 g/day either as intermittent boluses or continuous infusion would be suitable for patients with augmented renal clearance; lower doses may be considered for patients with impaired renal function as empirical suggestions. Ongoing dosing should be tailored to the individual patient circumstances. Notably, the study population was small and dosing recommendations may not be generalizable to all critically ill patients.

The effect of a loading dose of meropenem on outcomes of patients with sepsis treated by continuous renal replacement: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) are both responsible for the alterations of the pharmacokinetics of antibiotics. For patients with sepsis receiving CRRT, the serum concentrations of meropenem in the early phase (< 48 h) was significantly lower than that in the late phase (> 48 h). This current trial aimed to investigate whether administration of a loading dose of meropenem results in a more likely achievement of the pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamics (PD) target (100% fT > 4 × MIC) and better therapeutic results in the patients with sepsis receiving CRRT. METHODS: This is a single-blinded, single-center, randomized, controlled, two-arm, and parallel-group trial. This trial will be carried out in Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology Guangdong, China. Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with critical sepsis or sepsis-related shock receiving CRRT will be included in the study. The subjects will be assigned to the control group and the intervention group (LD group) randomly at a 1:1 ratio, the estimated sample size should be 120 subjects in each group. In the LD group, the patient will receive a loading dose of 1.5-g meropenem resolved in 30-ml saline which is given via central line for 30 min. Afterward, 0.75-g meropenem will be given immediately for 30 min every 8 h. In the control group, the patient will receive 0.75-g meropenem for 30 min every 8 h. The primary objective is the probabilities of PK/PD target (100% fT > 4 × MIC) achieved in the septic patients who receive CRRT in the first 48 h. Secondary objectives include clinical cure rate, bacterial clearance rate, sepsis-related mortality and all-cause mortality, the total dose of meropenem, duration of meropenem treatment, duration of CRRT, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), C-reactive protein levels, procalcitonin levels, white blood cell count, and safety. DISCUSSION: This trial will assess for the first time whether administration of a loading dose of meropenem results in a more likely achievement of the PK/PD target and better therapeutic results in the patients with sepsis receiving CRRT. Since CRRT is an important therapeutic strategy for sepsis patients with hemodynamic instability, the results from this trial may help to provide evidence-based therapy for septic patients receiving CRRT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trials Registry, ChiCTR2000032865 . Registered on 13 May 2020, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=53616 .

Therapeutic Target Attainment of 3-Hour Extended Infusion of Meropenem in Patients With Septic Burns.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective cohort study was to evaluate the therapeutic target attainment of 3-hour extended infusion of meropenem in patients with septic burns in the early and late periods of septic shock. METHODS: Meropenem serum levels were determined by liquid chromatography from blood samples collected within 48 hours (early period) of therapy and 10 to 14 days afterward (late period). Pharmacokinetic properties were investigated by noncompartmental analysis, and the therapeutic target was defined as 100% of the time above the MIC (100%fT> MIC). FINDINGS: Fifteen patients with 90 measured meropenem concentrations were included. Throughout the entire course of antimicrobial therapy, the therapeutic target was attained against gram-negative pathogens with an MIC ≤ 2 mg/L. Pathogens with intermediate susceptibility to meropenem were only covered in the early phase of therapy. IMPLICATIONS: Higher-dose regimens or continuous infusions may be necessary to guarantee antimicrobial coverage of meropenem against less sensitive pathogens in patients with septic burns.

Investigation of pharmacokinetic and clinical outcomes of various meropenem regimens in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and augmented renal clearance.

INTRODUCTION: Augmented renal clearance (ARC) defined as creatinine clearance (Clcr) above 130 mL/min/1.73m2 may lead to suboptimal antibacterial treatment. The aim of this study was to determine a strategy for meropenem administration to achieve both pharmacodynamic-pharmacokinetic (PK-PD) target (50%fT > MIC) and better clinical outcomes in patients with VAP and ARC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, patients with VAP and high risk for ARC were recruited. An 8-h urine collection was performed on the 1st, 3rd, and 5th days of study to measure Clcr. Included patients were divided into three groups: (1) 1 g meropenem, 3-h infusion, (2) 2 g meropenem, 3-h infusion, (3) 1 g meropenem, 6-h infusion. On the 2nd, 3rd, and 5th days of treatment, peak and trough blood samples were collected to undergo HPLC assay. MICs were assessed using microdilution method. Patients were also clinically monitored for 14 days. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included. Group 3 showed significanty higher rate of patients achieving fT > MIC > 50% (100% for group 3 versus 40% for group 2 and 13% for group 1; p = 0.0001). Mean fT > MIC% was significantly higher in group 3 (78.77 ± 5.87 for group 3 versus 49.6 ± 7.38 for group 2 and 43.2 ± 7.98 for group 1; p = 0.0001). Statistical analysis showed no significant differences among groups regarding clinical improvement. CONCLUSION: According to the findings of this trial, prolonged meropenem infusion is an appropriate strategy compared to dose elevation among ARC patients.

Population Pharmacokinetics Analysis and Dosing Simulations Of Meropenem in Critically Ill Patients with Pulmonary Infection.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model for meropenem to optimize dosing regimens for critically ill patients with pulmonary infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective PPK study of meropenem was conducted on a pooled dataset of 236 blood samples obtained from 48 patients with pulmonary infection in the intensive care unit. Meropenem plasma concentrations were measured by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method, and the data were analyzed using NONMEM. The effect of covariates on meropenem pharmacokinetics was investigated. The probability of target attainment (PTA) to achieve the target of 100% fT>MIC at the proposed dosage regimens were investigated by Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: A two-compartment model adequately described the data with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as a covariate significantly associated with the clearance (CL) from the central compartment. The typical value of CL was 7.48 L/h, with an eGFR adjustment factor of 0.0103 mL•1.73 m2/min, and the typical values of volume of the central compartment (V1), peripheral compartmental clearance (Q), and volume of the peripheral compartment (V2) were 15.9 L, 15.8 L/h, and 14.8 L, respectively. The goodness-of-fit plots, normalized prediction distribution error, and visual predictive checks showed good fitting and predictability of the final PPK model. When eGFR was >90 mL/min/1.73 m2, and there was a short duration of infusion (<60min), it was difficult for the probability target attainment (PTA) to reach >90% for MIC ≥ 2. Continuous infusion and frequent administration were necessary to achieve the target of 100% fT>MIC for critically ill patients with pulmonary infection. CONCLUSION: To achieve the optimal PTA, meropenem must be administered by frequent administration or continuously by an intravenous infusion. Our findings provide important information to optimize the meropenem regime in critically ill patients with pulmonary infection depending on eGFR values.

Individual Meropenem Clearance in Infants on ECMO and CVVHDF is Difficult to Predict: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVES: Meropenem is a broad-spectrum carbapenem antibiotic with mostly renal excretion. Conflicting data are available regarding meropenem pharmacokinetics in critically ill neonates on concomitant continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Our objectives were to assess meropenem clearance in a neonate on CRRT and ECMO, compare it to previously published data and assess whether dose recommendations can be generalized in this population. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 2.5 kg male infant with a large diaphragmatic hernia was delivered by cesarean section at week 35 and immediately mechanically ventilated due to shock and respiratory insufficiency. He underwent surgical correction of the hernia, but developed recurrent sepsis, multiorgan failure and pulmonary hypertension. He remained mechanically ventilated and required ECMO and continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration. He was started on meropenem 40 mg/kg/dose, every 8 hs for Enterobacter cloacae bacteremia and sepsis, but due to lack of clinical and microbiologic response despite in vitro susceptibility, he was started on a continuous meropenem infusion of 240 mg/kg/d, based on dose recommendations in a similar case. We measured steady state meropenem plasma concentrations on 2 occasions, during ECMO and continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) and then on CVVHDF only. RESULTS: Meropenem serum concentrations were 90 and 64 mg/L on the first and second occasion (therapeutic target concentration, 10 mg/L) corresponding to a clearance of 1.9 and 2.6 mL/kg/min. This clearance estimate was substantially lower than that reported in toddlers on CRRT and ECMO in some studies. CONCLUSION: In neonates and infants, meropenem clearance is difficult to predict because of dynamic ontogenetic changes in renal function. This problem is further aggravated in acutely ill infants with decreased renal function, renal replacement therapy and/or ECMO. Therefore, Target Concentration Intervention based on meropenem plasma concentrations is indispensable to ensure therapeutic exposure in this population.

Comparative Plasma and Interstitial Tissue Fluid Pharmacokinetics of Meropenem Demonstrate the Need for Increasing Dose and Infusion Duration in Obese and Non-obese Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A quantitative evaluation of the PK of meropenem, a broad-spectrum ß-lactam antibiotic, in plasma and interstitial space fluid (ISF) of subcutaneous adipose tissue of obese patients is lacking as of date. The objective of this study was the characterisation of meropenem population pharmacokinetics in plasma and ISF in obese and non-obese patients for identification of adequate dosing regimens via Monte-Carlo simulations. METHODS: We obtained plasma and microdialysate concentrations after administration of meropenem 1000 mg to 15 obese and 15 non-obese surgery patients from a prospective clinical trial. After characterizing plasma- and microdialysis-derived ISF pharmacokinetics via population pharmacokinetic analysis, we simulated thrice-daily (TID) meropenem short-term (0.5 h), prolonged (3.0 h), and continuous infusions. Adequacy of therapy was assessed by the probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment (PTA) analysis based on time unbound concentrations exceeded minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) on treatment day 1 (%fT > MIC) and the sum of PTA weighted by relative frequency of MIC values for infections by pathogens commonly treated with meropenem. To avoid interstitial tissue fluid concentrations below MIC for the entire dosing interval during continuous infusions, a more conservative PK/PD index was selected (%fT > 4 × MIC). RESULTS: Adjusted body weight (ABW) and calculated creatinine clearance (CLCRCG_ABW) of all patients (body mass index [BMI] = 20.5-81.5 kg/m2) explained a considerable proportion of the between-patient pharmacokinetic variability (15.1-31.0% relative reduction). The ISF:plasma ratio of %fT > MIC was relatively similar for MIC ≤ 2 mg/L but decreased for MIC = 8 mg/L over ABW = 60-120 kg (0.50-0.20). Steady-state concentrations were 2.68 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.11-3.37) higher in plasma than in ISF, supporting PK/PD targets related to four times the MIC during continuous infusions to avoid suspected ISF concentrations constantly below the MIC. A 3000 mg/24 h continuous infusion was sufficient at MIC = 2 mg/L for patients with CLCRCG_ABW ≤ 100 mL/min and ABW < 90 kg, whereas 2000 mg TID prolonged infusions were adequate for those with CLCRCG_ABW ≤ 100 mL/min and ABW > 90 kg. For MIC = 2 mg/L and %fT> MIC = 95, PTA was adequate in patients over the entire investigated range of body mass and renal function using a 6000 mg continuous infusion. A prolonged infusion of meropenem 2000 mg TID was sufficient for MIC ≤ 8 mg/L and all investigated ABW and CLCRCG_ABW when employing the PK/PD target %fT > MIC = 40. Short-term infusions of 1000 mg TID were sufficient for CLCRCG_ABW ≤ 130 mL/min and distributions of MIC values for Escherichia coli, Citrobacter freundii, and Klebsiella pneumoniae but not for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis indicated a need for higher doses (≥ 2000 mg) and prolonged infusions (≥ 3 h) for obese and non-obese patients at MIC ≥ 2 mg/L. Higher PTA was achieved with prolonged infusions in obese patients and with continuous infusions in non-obese patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT: 2012-004383-22.

Combination of Pharmacokinetic and Pathogen Susceptibility Information To Optimize Meropenem Treatment of Gram-Negative Infections in Critically Ill Patients.

Meropenem is one of the most frequently used antibiotics to treat life-threatening infections in critically ill patients. This study aimed to develop a meropenem dosing algorithm for the treatment of Gram-negative infections based on intensive care unit (ICU)-specific resistance data. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative bacteria obtained from critically ill patients was carried out from 2016 to 2020 at a tertiary care hospital. Based on the observed MIC distribution, stochastic simulations (n = 1,000) of an evaluated pharmacokinetic meropenem model, and a defined pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target (100%T>4×MIC while minimum concentrations were <44.5 mg/L), dosing recommendations for patients with varying renal function were derived. Pathogen-specific MIC distributions were used to calculate the cumulative fraction of response (CFR), and the overall MIC distribution was used to calculate the local pathogen-independent mean fraction of response (LPIFR) for the investigated dosing regimens. A CFR/LPIFR of >90% was considered adequate. The observed MIC distribution significantly differed from the EUCAST database. Based on the 6,520 MIC values included, a three-level dosing algorithm was developed. If the pathogen causing the infection is unknown (level 1), known (level 2), known to be neither Pseudomonas aeruginosa nor Acinetobacter baumannii, or classified as susceptible (level 3), a continuous infusion of 1.5 g daily reached sufficient target attainment independent of renal function. In all other cases, dosing needs to be adjusted based on renal function. ICU-specific susceptibility data should be assessed regularly and integrated into dosing decisions. The presented workflow may serve as a blueprint for other antimicrobial settings.